Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



HHO Cell - Stan Meyer Design.

Started by peterpierre, October 11, 2008, 05:01:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

What do you think about my current findings in regards to my interpretation of Stanley Meyers System?

I think you're right on track.
Should work but I have reservations. (please post explanation)
I think you're way off. (please post explanation)

peterpierre

Quote from: Grumpy on December 15, 2008, 11:09:21 AM
I think Meyer's toroid is just a regular transformer according to this from his patent:


so, what all the hype over the toroid?

Still looking for a reference tot he piezo stuffs in his devices - anyone got one handy?



I couldn't agree more with you Grumpy - thats exactly what it actually is :)

Grumpy

Quote from: peterpierre on December 15, 2008, 11:42:15 AM
I couldn't agree more with you Grumpy - thats exactly what it actually is :)

I am suspecting that the piezo was BS.  Where did you get this detail from?
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

peterpierre

Quote from: Grumpy on December 15, 2008, 03:25:47 PM
I am suspecting that the piezo was BS.  Where did you get this detail from?

Nope, no BS ... it's mechanical - how did you come to think that it would be BS?

Grumpy

Quote from: peterpierre on December 15, 2008, 03:30:55 PM
Nope, no BS ... it's mechanical - how did you come to think that it would be BS?

I can't find an acceptable reference to support it's use (piezo that is).

I also read several explanations of how Meyer's devices work and none of them fit.  For example, Meyer used an insulated housing for his water capacitor (resonant cavity) - the water was only between the inner rod and the outer cylinder.  Don't see anyone following this approach - why not?

I would not be surprised if Meyer's wasn't electrolysing at all...

It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

peterpierre

Quote from: Grumpy on December 15, 2008, 04:00:39 PM
I can't find an acceptable reference to support it's use (piezo that is).

I also read several explanations of how Meyer's devices work and none of them fit.  For example, Meyer used an insulated housing for his water capacitor (resonant cavity) - the water was only between the inner rod and the outer cylinder.  Don't see anyone following this approach - why not?

I would not be surprised if Meyer's wasn't electrolysing at all...



Actually everything in his cell was submerged in water, besides how can you trust that whatever records exist will be telling the truth? Why do you think he is dead now and not alive? Coincidence? Misteriously after he died 2 weeks later all his equipment including the dune buggy vanished, how is there supposed to be even one accurate record of his work except for what the patent office is willing to disclose? Not to mention - the patent office = the government ... so fat chance they'll be crapping in their own backyard. What we see on the net is a 1001 interpretations of how his devices might have worked and thats all we have to go with, but neither one of those solutions by itself is really the answer, it's like a big puzzle - all we know it is working and perfectly possible, everything else is just interpretations, you have to pick the points in each interpretation that make the most sense and closest resemble his explanations in the videos (because those are the only real proof of what he really had to say - papers and drawings can be fakes or disinformation) and puzzle the thing together and then and only then will you find the real truth. He was right K.I.S.S. is the motto ... Keep it simple stupid. And simple it is - really if one is willing to open their eyes and ears (and mind perhaps). But thats my point of view - everybody has to make their own mind up, I made mine up. :)