Toroidal Motor

[jadaro2600]

Jadaro, I can't believe you asked about the solid state solution.  Would the solid state device change the underlying principals of the mechanical setup?

Speaking purely binary: 1

A solid state device would prove that magnets have current flowing through them - being channeled through the aether.

A mechanical setup would just further prove the current norms.

[gravityblock]

Speaking purely binary: 1

A solid state device would prove that magnets have current flowing through them - being channeled through the aether.

A mechanical setup would just further prove the current norms.

Jadaro, we're definitely not on the same page.  It's OK that we do not agree.  It would be a boring world, if everyone thought and agreed to everything I thought.

Believe what you want.  I know that a mechanical device proves the same thing as a solid state device.  That is just common sense.  The same underlying principals used for building a mechanical device would also be employed into the solid state device.  They would both represent the same principals.

So, Speaking purely binary: 0   

[Low-Q]

So according to you a hompolar generator is...not a generator? LOL  . Low-q you are just arguing for the sake of arguing it's a bit stupid. The reason why relative rotation does not inudce a voltage like you just said is because Einstein polluted physics with his relativity theories.The Lorentz transformation which turns a magnetic field into an electric field and vice versa between two moving frames is the biggest bag of bullshit in the whole of "academic" physics. A magnetic field stays a magnetic field regardless of my movement.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/farhom.htm

A homopolar generator is a generator, but not without Lenz law affecting it. And when it comes to who is arguing for the sake of arguing, I'm not so sure whos that is gonna be . You deny my experiments, deny that i have testresults of several experiments. And who are you rising above Einstein and other physicists? I know you do not know much such about physics after I read another thread about some transformers with these high Ohm resistors to make it Lenzless.

I got the beads, and made a very simple generator. The hope was to make the flux following the beads to prevent it from crossing the wire as shown in one of your previous pictures. What do you know - It didn't work. Not a single mV to indicate. The flux is somehow crossing the wire when it jumps from one side of the bead to the other, the flux HAS TO get "airborne" and cross the hole in the middle of the bead where the wire is. So I guess it wasn't that easy to make a hmopolar generator with several windings after all. I kind a knew the result in advance, but I had to try it to proove me wrong or right.

I look forward to your physical proof of your theories. I also whish you could tune down a bit, and become a little more moderate in your unsurpassness as skills in physics - you might be wrong about it. If you're right, you may have to make a 10 cubic mile big generator to get out 1 pW. Then a windmill is far more efficient

Vidar

[Low-Q]

WOW. Jorge Guala-Valverde died last month. He died even on a relative young age namely 59. Looks like someone has to continue where he left off  .

Inform yourself and read what this man has shown...

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=579

He has played too much with mercury in his homopolar motor - maybe that was a catalyst to his death?

Vidar

[broli]

My neo mags came today and had lots of fun with them. All experiments were predictable others didn't do what I wanted.

@Jadaro2006: What I'm saying is nothing new in fact it's 150 years old. If you are ready to listen I will talk. But as long as you have that closed minded attitude we need to leave each other alone. Less talk more research please.