Anti-gravity Motor! (Everyone please read, very important)

[cameron sydenham]

as i see it, for work to be done, wether it be flight or propulsion to torque to turn, newton must be answered. action reaction, objects at rest..... so on.
when we walk, we push back on earth to go forward. when a rocket goes up, the propelant pushes back behind the object which then goes up.
gravity is unique, it pulls objects toward it, a constant attraction toward a singular point.
Centrifugal force is a reverse representation of gravity. always pushing out from a singular point. I still firmly believe that by working with this force, ou is very attainable. (I still think the design we came up with will work. )

I have and will continue to knock on doors and call who ever might be able to help. I now understand the issue of looking in here on this site, being an open source community and all.

[gravityblock]

as i see it, for work to be done, wether it be flight or propulsion to torque to turn, newton must be answered. action reaction, objects at rest..... so on.
when we walk, we push back on earth to go forward. when a rocket goes up, the propelant pushes back behind the object which then goes up.
gravity is unique, it pulls objects toward it, a constant attraction toward a singular point.
Centrifugal force is a reverse representation of gravity. always pushing out from a singular point. I still firmly believe that by working with this force, ou is very attainable. (I still think the design we came up with will work. )

I have and will continue to knock on doors and call who ever might be able to help. I now understand the issue of looking in here on this site, being an open source community and all.

I agree with you Cameron.  It appears this open source community will turn a deaf ear to this.  They're not interested in even the possibility of a truth on the basis it's not open sourced.  There is nothing new under the sun.  Everything will be revealed, weather it's open sourced or not.

Their argument, is nothing has come to the public from a patented source regarding OU.   They're right.  What ever happened to Tippett's patented idea?  Nothing.  I have found a pdf article on his gyroscope motor idea that goes back to the year of 2000.  Where is this gyroscope motor after 9 years? Tippett has the financial means to bring this to the public, but it's still not available.  It either doesn't work, he was ignored, he was bought out with non-disclosure agreements or with other threats and pushed under the carpet by the powers that are. 

Who is right?  Neither is right.  It just continues to be ignored by both sides. lol

[cameron sydenham]

lets assume the motor design I have will work, or any one, here is the dilemma and what our efforts are to bring to everyone.

if one does not pattent, we face the possibility of someone else bettering the idea, then patenting and "selling out"
The wrong person comes up with the idea, patents it, and sells out"

What we have come up with. patent the 3or 4 integral parts, patent these parts, (they are what we came up with anyway) than offer licenses to any manufacture to make them with no exclusive rights. Some people say that no one will pay a penny without exclusive rights. well, lets see how this plays out. go to ge or Toyota or whoever, they say no, we want exclusive rights, we say no, and go to a smaller co, they say, OK, GE or Toyota now is in competition with a smaller company, that has a totally green motor.
the larger company will play ball, or go out of business. I believe that with this process, you force a level playing Field. I could be wrong, but I guess time will tell.
Cam

[AhuraMazda]

So you think anti-gravity motor is not invented already and you are worried about your (future) patent rights!
The military has already got all the know how and they would want to keep a lid on it as long as they can.
On the other hand if you open source your knowledge,  you will be recognized and your name will live on, and
you make your money in other ways.

If you really have something, maybe you should contact John Searl. He will tell you how ego maniacs drive a good man into the ground.

[gravityblock]

@Cameron:

That is one of the problems with open sourcing.  Someone else comes along, patents it, and takes credit for it.  Now it is no longer open sourced.  Licensing agreements after achieving a patent is the best way to go, like you have said.

One thing to keep in mind,  this is not your average technology.  Just like Ahura mentioned, the government already has this technology.  There is good reason why it's not public, as far as the governments are concerned.  Do you really believe they will allow you to bring this to the public, since they have been suppressing it?

You must ask yourself these questions.  Does the government have this technology?  If yes, then Why is it being suppressed?   If no, then why haven't they figured it out, since they have all the resources.  They have the best minds in the world.  Unlimited financial resources.  Unlimited access to information.  Access to physics that is not taught in the schools.  Reversed engineering of UFO's or possible help from other species not of this planet (This is based on speculation, but the evidence is overwhelming).  Can I bring this to the market if the government and big corporates are suppressing this technology?

I'm not against you.  It is evident there will be resistance from all sides. 

We don't even know if the people here even accepts your device, method, or an unidirectional force could lead to OU or anti-gravity.  I haven't even been able to get their opinion on this.  It's just being ignored.  There isn't a reason to discuss this device if people aren't willing to share their thoughts on this.  Let's first get their opinions on this, then maybe we can move forward.

I haven't heard one person give a reason for it not working.  Also, I haven't heard one person say it will work.  What do we do now?  There is nothing we can do, until we can have a discussion.