German Scientist Posts Complete Free Energy Documentation Online

[Xaero_Vincent]

So I've created a simple rotor and tested it with a charged balloon. At best the rotor will spin for a quarter of a revolution. I don't think ionized winds is causing rotation because there is an attractive image-charge and unless I hold the balloon perfectly the rotor wont turn at all but you'll still hear crackling sounds (which is a static discharge) to the rotor. So the balloon is discharging so thats why it wont spin for long.

I'm going to try a rotor made out of paper. That should mitigate discharge current since paper is a poor conductor but the image-charge force will persist.

BTW, J L Naudin's PFT mk motors are quite interesting, especially the mk2. Hook this up to an earth-field antenna and the power would be free, literally. Radiant energy harnessed in this fashion is completely conventional and valid by our current laws of physics. A nice thought/project to revert to in case I'm wrong about Dr. Turtur's device and that it actually doesn't work.

[Vladokv]

Field source need to be hard isolated from everything, and charged with vandegraff generator, othervise results won't be noticeable. Rotor may stay not isolated. Use blades with triangle shape, as described in earlier documents. You can't use ballon and paper to make it work. It requires litle bit more precision, or rotor get stuck in one position

[Xaero_Vincent]

Well I observed rotation with a rotor made of flash card paper, plastic drinking straws for axis supports, wooden toothpick shaft, and a rubber eraser base.

A charged balloon over the top of paper rotor made it spin about one revolution before stopping. Holding the balloon to the side of the rotor will cause rotation as well. Moving the balloon back and forth around the side of the blades causes the rotor to move back in forth like a magnet attracted to a screw.

I cannot fully discredit ion winds because there is a leakage current occurring somehow because the rotor doesn't spin indefinitely. Additionally, I've witnessed rotation in opposite directions fairly easily by bending the tips of the rotor blades or positioning the balloon differently near the rotor blades.

However, if the motion is caused by ion winds generated between the balloon and the non-conductive paper rotor with a wooden shaft and rubber eraser base then...

a) Why is there no crackling discharge sound or ion wind hissing sound when I bring the balloon close to the rotor and watch it spin? Note: I hear absolutely no sound caused by the rotor even when wearing a hearing amplifying device with the volume turned to maximum.

b) Why isn't there any visible corona discharge even in a dark closet? I can clearly see such discharges rubbing the balloon against a blanket but not near the rotor.

c) Why does the rotor move back and forth in attraction with a balloon hovering back and forth? This is exactly what to expect from an attractive image charge.

With this said its appears plausible to suspect that the rotation might be caused by the attractive forces generated by the electrostatic field. This is Mr. Turtur's conclusion as well but he adds the vacuum energy element into the equation, namely the birefringence of zero-point electromagnetic waves near strong electrostatic and magnetic fields.

My next move shall be testing a metal version in a vacuum with some sort of high-voltage power supply. I have a cheap vacuum pump that hooks up to a garage air compressor. I can probably make a cheap HV power supply with batteries, an inverter circuit with step up transformer or voltage multipliers. Other possibilities include buying a Van de Graaff generator or building a stationary earth-field antenna which captures free electricity from the atmosphere.

I'm not sure when I'll find the time to conduct the the vacuum experiment. I'll leave this thread to rest until I do. 

[flathunter]

BTW, J L Naudin's PFT mk motors are quite interesting, especially the mk2. Hook this up to an earth-field antenna and the power would be free, literally. Radiant energy harnessed in this fashion is completely conventional and valid by our current laws of physics. A nice thought/project to revert to in case I'm wrong about Dr. Turtur's device and that it actually doesn't work.

I've built a PFT mk2 motor with a kinder surprise case as my dielectric rotor, and 2 kronenburg cans as the stator electrodes.  do you have any links to earth field antennae designs that would power it?   

[Xaero_Vincent]

Flathunter,

try this archived link (its dead now):

http://web.archive.org/web/20070831015229/http://www.wireservices.com/n9zrt/live-wire/events/marconi/kitefaq.html

*also*

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.only1egg-productions.org%2FAltSci%2FElectrostaticMotors%2FImages%2FAmazing_Motor_That_Draws_Power_From_The_Air_PS_Apr_1971.PDF&ei=l7V1StqaBoKwsgPgw4X8CA&rct=j&q=earth-field+antennas&usg=AFQjCNFsAfnN4YW1cLNKHsaYRuNJsmPaCw

It has information on kite-lifted antennas. Balloon lifted antennas could work as well.

Essentially all this is a very long wire hooked up to a balloon or kite with a needle-like tip at the top. There is danger evolved so be careful and know the local laws--low-flying aircraft, hitting power lines, etc.

It would be interesting to see if a stationary antenna (a long metal pole or rod in the ground) with a sharp mildly radioactive tip could induce ionization current at a much lower altitude (say perhaps 10 or 20 meters or less). Such a design can be on your property and not interfere with air traffic or risk coming in contact with power lines. With some land acreage perhaps an array of these stationary antennas can be hooked up to multiply the power.

This radiant source of electricity can be used power Dr. Turtur's electrostatic motor as well. In this case the power would be free regardless of whether or not his and my rotor harnesses vacuum energy to amplify the output power. Although he's performed measurements and experiments, so unless all his experiments were conducted incorrectly the output power is up to 50x greater or more than the input.

BTW, I wouldn't spend much time on dialectic materials. If you look at Naudin's graph the rotation begins to slow down as the capacitance increases. So while the voltage stays the same and the current is reduced the rotation is reduced as well; its certainly not a way of achieving OU. This is probably why he hasn't experimented with the motors since 1999.