Magnetic amplification and neutralization motor by Art Porter

[CompuTutor]

In case you want to watch full screen,
instead of that size constrained box...

UPDATE:
This forum's new kernal doesn't recognise the extended ASCII characters in the eleven links I posted...

I yanked 'um for now until I can figure a workaround.

I am im possetion of all eleven and the SWF player,
I have them as a kit as backup, but the kit is 163-MB...

[onthecuttingedge2005]

you mean this one?

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, the old hat notion of why cant i buy one if its real, is really getting old and its not working to well anymore since people are thinking for themselves more and more. Folks, whether your hired to debunk or not, your colors are becoming more and more obvious. I would choose wisely to support humanity and not the interests of the few. With that said, i will be testing a small model of this. Right now, what i find interesting is the fact that when i put my neo magnets at the back of my coil/core and pulse to repel against the stator permanent magnet it nullifies all attraction to a piece of steel at other end. I'm not quite sure why this occurs, though i am giving it thought. At first glance, one would think that the magnetic field set up by the electromagnet to repel/nullify the stator permanent magnets field within the core would still attract the steel piece at the other end, but that does not happen, the coil/core acts as if it has no magnetic field at all. The combined magnetic field of the coil and permanent magnet is canceled. As simple as this is, i never ran quite this exact experiment to notice it and i believe that Bill Muller was doing something similar, as in one of his videos he shows a permanent magnet with a steel ball bearing attached and he lets another steel ball bearing be quickly attracted to the other steel ball and the first ball bearing attracted is violently repelled. Just a few thoughts.
peace love light
Tyson

[CompuTutor]

'All forces' have not been netted in this persons demo and gross ratio after all forces have been accounted for. there is an error in his math by not using all netted forces in this demo. you can't net a force without netting all the forces, this is totally wrong and gives people the impression that it is that easy, it is not! I wish it was that easy and if it was there would be perpetual devices running all over the place even though there is not!

OK, I'm committing the same crime here...
By re-posting the reply...

Wow, dude,

But why in the world did you
quote me to cite social/forum issues?

You've always but right-up on all
the comments I have ever read,
perhaps you meant to quote
another person by mistake ?

All I provided was links with no opinion.

I've watched, your worth reasonable respect,
But I'm not part of the opposing discussion,
I'm a provider of reference links ONLY here.

Did I cross a boundary that
is new to cyber-futilism I don't know?

Oh, and this new forum "Update"
NOW can't use the extended ASCII
character to make vids 4-11 work...

I've tried like a zillion ways around it,
the video pack is only 163-MB,
but it is obvious I can't post it here.

No offense meant Edge for sure,
kinda don't get your reaction really.

For others, websites and data evaporate daily,
I download many forums daily as a defense,
(Not this one Stafan, hope that's not some new insult)
But I already downloaded the cores of gap-power.com

ONLY because I have learned data goes away eventually...

I may be on a balance beam on this,
I wage intellectual rights and property,
against loss of data period for all
that (It) was posted public...sue me.

More directly (As I want to participate)
I have three current running themes:

1 - Coils catch "Stuff" while fields collapse (Timing dependant)
2 - parallel path is prime application theory and proven
3 - Applying this to #1 yields off the charts possibilities !

OK, I just wanted to help with links and stuff,
I am now dragged into this opposition discusion
of beliefs that I see as no different in the first place!

This is not crap people, open your eyes!

Yup measurement (In vids) are also crap,
but that discovery even explains so anyway
SIMPLE fundamentals of observation.

Edge, your right in that they do not supply a secondary rotary plateau to run gauges from, but the straight-pull math IS CORRECT.

Both you an I are not dumb enough to fall for rotary to stationary axial measurements

I have tested parallel path variables, these forward looking statements are correct,
but yes your right, they are trying to apply them to rotary geometry.

Almost always a failure point...BUT,
replace that wheel with a section of a wheel (Lever),
and it makes sense what the thinking is, right?

his observations without judice
will yield faulty results and data.

Oh an I am on a hunt to find
(From 128 extended ASCII characters)
the correct value for "Space-Bar" for links.

I mean those that this forum (Software) engine will respect.

Meanwhile, in the interest of backing up
and not loosing "gap-power.com" to .GOV's.

Where can I supplant a 163-MB file,
without really short inactivity penalties?

OH, and would you (OnTheCuttingEdge)
please edit that post before you cannot.

Please remove my entire quote,
as it is faulty due to new forum issues.

I am going back and removing my post
(Until URL submissions are respected).

Maybe I'll host the twelve as archive,
but that would require the site's approval.

Sigh

[CompuTutor]

OK, why can't I delete a double post here too?