Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic amplification and neutralization motor by Art Porter

Started by LarryC, February 20, 2010, 05:07:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

synchro1


Gotoluc drives the ignition coil with a spark from a gator clip on a Neo magnet sphere. You can drive your magnet coil simply by jumping a spark off one of the magnets like Gotoluc:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_3OkDvmp_Y

GreaT

@alextechmen You should use a $2 arduino nano instead of this expensive controller.

Quote from: alextecmen on October 17, 2020, 09:48:51 PMThe control used by Art Porter is very expensive, it has a very high price.
There is one that knows a cheaper one and that can fulfill the same function of activating the relays.

Or if there is a scheme to build a simple control to activate the two relays. and at what frequency you have to operate them.

Thank you all for your comments and contributions

alextecmen

Quote from: synchro1 on October 25, 2020, 06:47:37 AM

The P switch delivers a retarded pulse phase that increases the BEMF window. I think the P option applies to the other switchs too. You have no way to control the pulse timing with your Dremal! The coil needs off time for output. The destination reverses and becomes the source. There can be no input while the coil is outputting power as the source. The only BEMF output available from the coil is inside the off time frame you allow the coil to output power as source. You are fighting the output.

The coil needs to be off more then on to generate BEMF power!


Agree, with my controller I am aware that it is not optimal as I mentioned, of course the field has to be interrupted, cut the current, and let the BEMF generate.

Mr. Art Porter mentions that the wave turn on should be 30 milliseconds, and the turn off 10 milliseconds, which gives about 25 hz, if I'm wrong, correct me.

In the test with the 8-strip machined rotor, when the connectors were pressed more and the speed of the disk slowed down, he got a good result, because, because it gave him more time to energize the coil and also gave him time to the quenching and induction of BEMF.

Let's do a test, I already did it, for example I make contact and energize the coil and hold for about 5 or 10 seconds, we have the magnetic field in the coil well formed, then I disconnect, I would expect the required induction to be generated, that the test bulb It will light up very well, but no, the bulb or a little lighting, no brightness, but because if I have a good field that was formed, and when it collapses it must induce very well.

Now let's continue with another test, I manually connect and disconnect the contacts quickly, now if I get a few flashes of light,
which indicates that you have to have a frequency and duty cycle in order to obtain the best BEMF induction, and of course not fight against the on and off cycle.

What I comment above is already known to all of you, most of you.

little by little I am going to incorporate the most optimal devices


alextecmen

Quote from: GreaT on October 25, 2020, 02:52:10 PM
@alextechmen You should use a $2 arduino nano instead of this expensive controller.


If I have the arduinos, I'll see when I incorporate it,
I already have a circuit to make the generator with ic 555.
I have a pulse generator there, I hope to find it.
the proposal of
   synchro1
(A Reed Switch (Ground to Gate) P channel MOSFET and Relay :)

It is also interesting
thanks for your contributions and proposals, comments and videos, so we continue to learn, inform and build