Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



SMOT Triangular Enclosure Variation, Closed Loop?

Started by jeffc, July 26, 2007, 10:35:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User actions

HopeForHumanity

#15
July 28, 2007, 04:22:46 PM
What if we tried these ideas, but add zero friction? ???
Ron Paul is internet overunity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnBZd4nyWk

WE MUST STOP THIS! Free energy is being surpressed because of it!

apollo69

#16
July 28, 2007, 06:42:21 PM
http://www.schmalenbach.de/patent/

I think the triangle SMOT idea has been tried without any luck

Check this

http://www.hcrs.at/SMOT.HTM

I have been playing around with the idea too....but..I guess is perfect in combination with another device though  ::)

amen23

#17
July 28, 2007, 09:01:38 PM
The SMOT idea works but not the way you planned it........the way you've applied it will never work.1) Your exit for the ball is all wrong. The ball has to exit the forcefield before the tapered end of the row of magnets (about 3/4 of the way,possible more). To exit ,gravity is used (a straight drop out using the mass of your ball against the pull of the magnets) and it has to drop below the force field that surrounds the magnets at the end of the row.(if there isnt enought clearance it will attract)

which means you're faced with a dilemma .....2) your incline should be such that after you ball has broken free from the force field, you got enough energy to return it to to the start. The bigger the incline , the more attraction you need to pull your ball up, the stronger your magnets will need to be, the greater the force field that awaits you at the end. The smaller your ball ......ect ect

you can play around with the size of ball you are using...????
you can play around with the lenght of your rows of magnets ...????
you can even play around withthe strenght of your magnets ...???

;) just my 3 cents worth

jeffc

#18
July 29, 2007, 02:00:11 AM
Quote from: HopeForHumanity on July 28, 2007, 04:22:46 PM
What if we tried these ideas, but add zero friction? ???

;D
Zero friction would be very nice.  But, sadly it won't happen!   >:(

jeffc

#19
July 29, 2007, 02:03:47 AM
Quote from: apollo69 on July 28, 2007, 06:42:21 PM
http://www.schmalenbach.de/patent/

I think the triangle SMOT idea has been tried without any luck

Check this

http://www.hcrs.at/SMOT.HTM

I have been playing around with the idea too....but..I guess is perfect in combination with another device though  ::)

Thanks for those additional models.  I am trying to learn from each SMOT variation I can find.  There is still some experimentation to try and this information is helpful.

Regards,
jeffc
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User actions