Take the two Carousel rotors mounted sideways in those coils. We can distance them closely to maximize coupling strength as Hatem does, or further apart in the "Inertial Latch Zone" sweet spot. This is easy to feel for. We don't want to push them too close together where they begin to stick like Hatem's! We're positioning for a controlled "Slip Zone", where the force from acceleration is stronger then the inertial back hold from slowing.

There's a strong and a weak force ascertainable just like the poles, the north a bit weaker then the south. One spinner can break the coupling completely from drag, but the force to speed it back up is still exerted on it by the faster moving spinner magnet while the drag magnet is totally sliping. The magnets won't "Declutch" if they're too close!

The coils and magnet spinners would work best with one riding a fine positioning screw. Amp meters on input and output can help determine just exactly where to distance the rotors to decouple "Lenz Drag". This area probably corresponds exactly with the "Neutral Zone". This is where the "Inertial Latch Rule" applies. This turns out to be much easier then it sounds to deal with.

Momentum holds the advantage over inertia in the neutral zone decoupling contest. This is an all or nothing effect at point zero. When the drag magnet slows, it actually looses mass along with magnetic field strength, while the power rotor retains all it's strength; So, as the one magnet slows it grows weaker in strength and can't transfer it's waning effect as powerfully as the motor rotor with it's acceleration influence. This difference is stark at the balance point between the fields where a slight imbalance causes a complete slip of the "Yin Spin".

We need the rotors far enough apart to allow the satellite rotor to slip when it slows down and not as close as possible to maximize the coupling strength like Hatem. Two free spinning magnet spheres will orient themselves naturally at this distance from each other, and begin to revolve around themselves.

The satellite magnet can remain stationary inside the core of the output coil, and it will still generate "Lenz Free" output from the oscillation alone. The magnet would have to be repositioned back to it's original orientation. I tired to get Conradelektro to test this kind of magnet core output coil in the neutral zone and called it the "Synchro coil" but Conradelektro pushed it too far into the power rotor coupling zone trying to  treat it as an induction coil, and killed the oscillation.

This would reduce the test bed to one coil core mounted rotor, a wall plug wire, and a light bulb; Plus the stationary diametric magnet core output coil, and a fine positioning screw, to position inside a millimeter.

The test would involve disconnecting the bulb to see if there's a drop in input reflecting "Lenz Load".

The washtub drain motor satellite tube rotor would need the same kind of screw positioner to slip the "Lenz Drag" as the synchronous carousel.

Two different spinning magnets at different speeds always speeds the slower magnet up. Never does the slower magnet slow it's spinning partner down. This is the hard and fast principle of "Speed Latch". Conservation of energy wins out over entropy every time.

Here's a question: Does the faster magnet slow down as the slower magnet speeds up? Does the faster magnet's speed remain unchanged? Or, does the speed of the faster magnet increase along with the speed of it's satellite? Can we find evidence of "Anti-Drag Acceleration Synergy" between spinning magnets anywhere?

Why does placing magnets on the side of a D.C. motor speed the motor up with no rise in input as Chaniotakis shows in his video?