So is _this_ OU? I'm still trying to figure out of what RF's OU consists. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYDszv5t2Bw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhBgAAJUPsw

YOU MEAN YOU HAD THAT OVER UNITY DEAL UNDER YOUR BED FOR ALL THOSE YEARS.. COME ON
TK PLEASE SHOW US THE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM..4 DEGREES SOUTH OF THE EQUATOR
RIGHT SMACK IN THE INDIAN OCEAN..

  It is also important to consider, if the results and any additional gain are worth the effort, or  not.   
   I would love to see something useful and worthwhile, self running itself non stop. No batteries and no needed SG.   

 the Screaming fishermen from Seychelles Wrote ""  YOU MEAN YOU HAD THAT OVER UNITY DEAL UNDER YOUR BED FOR ALL THOSE YEARS.. COME ON
TK PLEASE SHOW US THE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM..4 DEGREES SOUTH OF THE EQUATOR
RIGHT SMACK IN THE INDIAN OCEAN..
end quote
...from the same Vid ...Tinsel Quote The link to the place where the basic circuit is given is given in the first of my Wireless Demo vids.end quote

Quote from: a.king21 on July 22, 2019, 09:51:29 PM
[
Vortex1:  But proof has been offered.  You stubbornly refuse to believe it as a possibility.  Consider the distance of the mr16s from the transmitter and remember the inverse square law.  You immediately have a closed mind approach to the evidence offered. Rick has repeatedly said you cannot prove anything over the internet. All you can do is exchange ideas. That is what this forum is for.  Anyway Rick has put his device forward for the 1 watt challenge in either one of his posts or videos (  i can't remember which).  That is what should be debated. Furthermore those members who are in the US can go to one of his meetings and verify matters for yourselves.  Now THAT come nearer to verification. Also members can be courteous. Courtesy gets you much further than insults. Fortunately Rick can give as much as he gets thrown at him.

Dear Aking21

Wrong, fail. You keep saying "according to rick's theory" but rick doesn't have a theory. He doesn't even have a viable hypothesis that can be peer reviewed. He has only conjecture, not demonstrated and unproven thus far. In science a paper of the proposed hypothesis must undergo peer review before replication or consensus and verification can claim it to lead to a viable and acceptable  theory.

You keep referring to rick as an inventor. What has he actually invented? I can find not a single patent application or patent assigned to rick, if I am wrong, post it here for review. Can he present an original circuit that he himself has  designed?

QuoteRick has repeatedly said you cannot prove anything over the internet.

  Unfortunately you and RF have demonstrated by your uninformed rhetoric that you have never actually worked as a profession in a modern electronic manufacturing facility as I and others here have. Between partzman and myself, we have probably a combined 100 years experience in such things. I don't know much about Gyula, but would guess from his practical electronics knowledge and communication skills that he has also spent considerable time in the industry.

In the old days before the internet, everything was usually done under one roof., circuit design concept, prototyping, verification, revisions, beta testing, bill of materials and assembly instructions etc.

Now, with the internet, various tasks are farmed out and work files are communicated via the internet between various groups, either in house or across the ocean.

A build document for e.g. a big screen TV can be created and prototyped by engineers at various locations, by passing files over the internet, then the final build information is sent to China or elsewhere and a Version1.01  implementation returns to be again verified revised as needed and then released for final production.

To make the statement that you cannot prove anything over the internet is complete naivete, and in doing this, you both expose not only your lack of experience in how things are done today, but make complete fools out of yourselves regarding the idea of "verification via internet"

So  RF where is your build document?, and test and verification procedures for your OU product which is being so earnestly promoted by your friend AKing21? Videos full of blah blah blah are not build, test and verify information and documentation.

So if the information has been presented to the forum for the "One Watt Challenge", where might I find it?

For "Vaporware", well  maybe?

As an aside, take a lesson from Brad and Graham on your videos, as Brad and Graham produce short, coherent, to the point, exactly descriptive of what they are doing and what they expect from a device. Partzman and Vasik also do this in their documentation of devices they present.

The image created on this thread is of a couple of minnows feverishly trying to do tricks for a half dozen dolphins who are now completely bored with their amateurish antics and are swimming away, no applause.

Regards

Stefan: Is this what you would call being a Naysayer (with your capital N)? A precise  explanation of how things are actually done in the real world and a call for documentation? A refutation of uninformed rhetoric? Or is this a rebuttal of certain statements, since I have no circuit, hypothesis or theory to evaluate?