Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

That quote is concerning the controller which is part G in the patent. assuming things work a different  way because that is the way you think it is suppose to work doesn't  always align with what i have experienced on the bench which is what i post from not what i think it should be done.
Assuming  will get you no where fast, benching gets to the point the correct way.
Good luck just the same.

Regards,

Marathonman

[ayeaye]

Did you measure input and output power when benching?

If you did measure overunity and have hard evidence what it was caused by, then i cannot say it's any different. But if you didn't, then no matter how much work you did or how well you did it, all we have is words.

But ok, do you argue that the induced current doesn't have to be greater than provided by the Faraday's law, then how can there be overunity, can you explain it?

I'm sorry, i'm not against you, but it is the task of all of us, to understand. How i see it, and i would like to see it it's wrong, and want to see why, so i and not only me can understand more.

[marathonman]

I personally think that producing more than what was put in is not possible but if one reuses or does not spend the potential in the exciting side of the system to act on another field in the process which is what Figuera device does then yes perpetual motion is possible.

the potential is not used up, it is recycled through out the inducing side of the system that acts on the induced side which both are closed systems of their own. the only time the inducing potential is used is to polarize the secondaries then they part ways and it is just the relative motion of the primaries that induce motion into the secondaries. that is the lenz law field from the secondaries being swept across the electric fields created by the primaries. after they part ways no other potential from the inducing side is used in the secondaries thus the potential is reused or recycled through out the primaries and part G the controller with a little feed back from the secondaries to replace the losses occurred and give rise to amplification to the rising primaries.

Regards,
Marathonman

[marathonman]

This is a good visualization of self Induction
the more loops are added in the controller part G the more the opposition to the original current flow.

Regards,

Marathonman

[marathonman]

So with the above post and pic as the brush rotates the amount of windings changes on each side of the brush kept separated by north opposing fields. When one winding is subtracted from one side it is added to the other side thus changing the magnetic flux to current ratio on either side.  when you  change this ratio you change the original current flow as per Faradays laws of induction any change in the magnetic field causes EMF and according  to the Lenz law it will produce an EMF that will oppose the original current flow.

So therefore by using a rotating positive contact Figuera was able to efficiently change the current flow through both primary sets opposite from one another by utilising  an Inductor in an active position in the circuit that changes the magnetic flux to current ratio which allowed him to control the current flow in a very,  very efficient manor then using the storing and releasing of potential to off set the potential drop of the rising side of the system. as we all know any increase in a coil there will be a potential drop across the conductor as it is storing into the magnetic field.

Regards

Marathonman