The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

[ramset]

Grum
Quote
Gary effect in action !!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACykTfXspfM


------------------------------
Grum
this Claim revolves around a switching effect ,where you feel there is a neutral "window"created that
can be Utilized to run with Gain [higher than original input?]??


is this correct ?


thx
Chet

[Grumage]

Grum
Quote
Gary effect in action !!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACykTfXspfM


------------------------------
Grum
this Claim revolves around a switching effect ,where you feel there is a neutral "window"created that
can be Utilized to run with Gain [higher than original input?]??


is this correct ?


thx
Chet

Dear ramset.

In a nutshell, yes !!

However T-1000 can explain it far better than I, I'm better with spanners !!   

Cheers Grum.

[T-1000]

this Claim revolves around a switching effect ,where you feel there is a neutral "window"created that
can be Utilized to run with Gain [higher than original input?]??


is this correct ?


thx
Chet

The iron bar has no resistance entering or leaving zone. The magnets get full force when the magnetic field poles switch on iron bar... So you have simple magnetic switch with output force far greater than input force. The energy comes directly from magnets so no physics "laws" are broken, just the basic magnetic forces are utilized in smart way...

Also that still leaves open question for conventional theorists - where energy comes from to magnets to keep them having magnetic field for a life of man (it still decays)...
Just personally I would not worry about answering that question before making practical use of energy from magnets.

[Heisenberg]

Guys,

Been lurking in the forum the past few days and felt inspired to post an idea. Syair's generator appears to show stationary coils and stationary magnets with moving soft iron between the two, presumably to 'disrupt' the stationary magnetic flux in order that the stationary coils 'see' a moving flux. From the coils relative perspective, it cannot differentiate between a moving magnet and a disrupted field of a stationary magnet - it will develop an output voltage proportional to the rate of flux change and the number of turns.

It ought to be a simple matter to verify such a scheme by constructing something along the following lines - has this (or similar) been done previously?

H.

[Heisenberg]

Guys,

Apologies for the large jpegs and double post - not quite got the hang of forum posting!!

H.