The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

You might have seen on the News that China is suffering from one of the worst earthquakes.

If we have the Flying Saucer technology perfected, we can help in much better ways.  Some Officials in China are still treating the technology as top military secret.  I hope that their objections will be less with this event.

The World does not need more military weapons.  The World needs pollution free energy and advanced transportation.

And what's stopping you from doing that? 

Dear Kul_ash.

When you get old and had two strokes, you would realize your own limitations.

It is now a matter of letting others shine.  Initially it was individuals like Wang, Forever, Top Gun and Sun.  ...
......

OK, let me see, I guessed you had the mathematical proof before you had your strokes and, in one stroke that knowledge is gone forever! And of course, that's a good excuse. Who would dare to question a old renowned scientist who has not one but two strokes! Poor thing and hence that's your answer Kul-ash!

I said he didn't have any because his Math and Physics is sincerley WRONG!

ps Mr. Tseung: Don't worry about making others 'shine' or how useful the flying saucers would be. I suggest you donate your HK$10K to these poor and dying people. They don't need your imaginary and non-existent theory. This gift gesture will make you 'shine', not your flawed math and physics! Those made you Stink!

cheers
chrisC

[Top Gun]

With due respect, I accept everything except your last statement! As far as my knowledge goes, there are meany flaws in your theory and the main one is it is not possible to give a perfect horizontal pull to a pendulum. I asked you and top_gun to show me a way to do that. He came up with many alternatives but i showed problems in them. I request you again to show me a way to a perfect horizontal and constant force applied on pendulum.
It is not required by you to develop a machine. Either you can give a complete mathematical analysis or pull a pendulum with your ull and show us the result. I think its pretty simple to do if you are so convinced with your system. Unfortunately, no one will accept your claim on basis of just a parallelogram of forces figure in your presentation. Every one is going to ask you how pendulum came to that position and where is the analysis of applied external force?
Please provide either the experimental data validated by some professionals or give a complete mathematical proof so that others can analyze

Dear Kul-ash,

You asked for a "perfect horizontal pull to a pendulum."

In Physics and Mathematics, there is no need for a ?perfect horizontal pull to a pendulum? in order to Lead Out gravitational energy.  As I mentioned again and again ? any pull with tension on the string (shown by Scale A) will Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

The tension on the string will have vertical and horizontal components.  The string will also have displacement.  Thus work must have been done by the string.  This is understood by every ?O Level Physics? Student.  That is the reason why I keep quoting ?O Level Physics?.  You should be able to understand this part of Physics.

The beauty of the ?Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory? is its simplicity.  The New Energy devices including the Flying Saucer have been developed.  The ?powerful? are trying to keep them as top military secrets.  There are paid debunkers trying to discredit every OU invention.

The Physics and Mathematics tells me:

The tension on the string will have vertical and horizontal components.  The string will also have displacement.  Thus work must have been done by the string.  In order words, Gravity must have done work via the string.  This is the Lead Out Energy.

Do you agree with the above???

[hansvonlieven]

? any pull with tension on the string (shown by Scale A) will Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

HOW ?   

Give me one example of leading out extra energy from a pendulum. And NO mathematics please, since that by itself is an oxymoron. The most basic axiom of mathematics is Ex nihilo nihil fit (Out of nothing comes nothing) Any mathematical proof of lead out energy would amount to the proof that nothing is larger than something  0>1 a conclusion mathematics as we know it does not permit.

Hans von Lieven

[Devil]

Dear Kul-ash,

You asked for a "perfect horizontal pull to a pendulum."
.....

Top Gun, hopefully, you now understand why I called you the stupid dog being led around the garden.

Previously, you tried to follow the logic of others such as:
(1)   A curved inclined plane is the same as a pendulum.
(2)   A perfect horizontal pull to a pendulum is required to Lead Out gravitational energy.
(3)   An inextensible string cannot do work.
(4)   If Lead Out were true, someone else would have found it long ago.
(5)   The patent examiners cannot be wrong.

You should lead them and not the other way round.  You are the expert.  I like your strong words:

The tension on the string will have vertical and horizontal components.  The string will also have displacement.  Thus work must have been done by the string.  In order words, Gravity must have done work via the string.  This is the Lead Out Energy.

[chrisC]

? any pull with tension on the string (shown by Scale A) will Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

HOW ?   

Give me one example of leading out extra energy from a pendulum. And NO mathematics please, since that by itself is an oxymoron. The most basic axiom of mathematics is Ex nihilo nihil fit (Out of nothing comes nothing) Any mathematical proof of lead out energy would amount to the proof that nothing is larger than something  0>1 a conclusion mathematics as we know it does not permit.

Hans von Lieven

Simple. ABRACADABRA!

Maybe down under you have to get some real bushmen to let swing a boomerang?
Just believe. No math or physics needed. It's all in your mind Hans!

cheers
chrisC