RESONANCE EFFECTS FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[samedsoft]

Dear Luc,

  When you check Aromaz circuit, Antenna simply provides UWO (Ultra Wide band oscillations) to the 2N2222 transistor. So this transistor drives 3055 transistors.

   Interestingly Aromaz uses HV coil and uses reactive loads.

  When you go back to master of UWO circuits and take a look at this page http://67.76.235.52/ecat2004.asp

  You will understand how Dr. Stiffler uses a polyphase transformer and achieves OU!

" Therefore the total power produced by this ECAT is 18.11 watts for an input of 8.25 watts. The power gain is therefore 18.11 / 8.25 =  2.194"

  You can consult Dr. Stiffler for further support because I do not really know how Poly-phase systems work...

  Thanks and regards,
  Nuri Temurlenk, Turkey

[gotoluc]

Luc,

1st I want to say great videos you have been doing.

Now about the calculations, from personal experiency, measuring power in VS power out using a resistor in series with the input circuit and a resistor in parallel with the output circuit will allways misslead you to OU.

I attached a snapshot that shows what I'm talking about. The top scope graph shows the voltage accross the output resistor and the bottom graph shows the voltage accross the input resistor, it clearly shows that this method of comparing power in VS power out is incorrect.


Now I'm not an EE, but I think the reason for this, it is because measuring it like this does not take in consideration for the inductor/capacitor reactance and in this case it is about 316 ohms for the inductor and 316 for the capacitor at 50.3 Hz. So I'm thinking if we use resistors that match the reactance resistance, then we could get acurate readings.

I also have been testing resonance circuits and have not yet verified OU.

Hi watercellguy,

thanks for your input. Please look at my new replacment coil test 12 video and let me know if this is a better way to calculate.

Link to new replacement video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylnH1-UGITE

Thanks for sharing.

Luc

[plengo]

Quick question guys,

I have a setup (not really related to what you are doing here but somehow related) which the picture shows. The 2 lead acid batteries are in series and they both power the device on the right. The device on the right also puts some energy back to the battery via the two diodes as shown.

The problem I am having is that the battery on the top (B2) reversed its polarity to a wooping 2 volts negative and the bottom battery (B1) did not discharge much at all (about .01v after 24 hours running).

The device consumes about 40 milli amps total. I have no ideia how much is returning from the device back to the battery yet.

Any one could explain to me how it is possible for a battery to reverse its polarity?

Really appreciated some answers.

Fausto.

[gotoluc]

@gotoluc
What appears very interesting in your setup is each coil is actually a step down transformer.
Am I seeing right?  Are those secondary windings made of only a few turns of thick wire?
Could you give us the figures of how many windings the primaries and secondaries are?

Hi AbbaRue,

you are right in a way. The resonating primary is about 90 turns .72mH and the pickup coil is 2 turns of oxidized 18 gauge clear plastic coated speaker wire. I placed the wire on the coil because it is easier to work with but keep in mind that they could be as much as 1" inch 2.5 cm away and it would work just as well.

Luc

[gotoluc]

Hello all,

It occurs to me that if you want to have a resonant circuit, it must be 'annoyed' into producing usable energy - in other words, it must want to do work through sound, light, heat or motion or some combination thereof rather than ground out.  It should work in the same way that a simple radio works ( but without being grounded )

It also occurs to me that when you ground something, chemicals in the soil may be producing a net electrical difference through differential metals and extraordinarily small currents or voltages should be accounted for and negated when taking measurements.

So doe the resonant effects have anything to do with simplistic radio or am I wrong?

- - -
I've been looking over this thread, and it appears that none of the devices built and shown should ever be taken near an airport - they all look like pipe bombs.

Hi jadaro2600,

I would agree ... this is the basics of radio.

I wounder when the RF squad will be by

Luc