Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

[forest]

    If we push a child upon a swing the child goes higher and higher.  The energy shifting between kinetic and potential.  If the child gets high enough on the swing to pick an apple off a nearby tree at the apex then the potential energy of the apple is added to the system.  Soon you had better back off because now your 60lb child is slowly turning into a 300 lb gorilla.  She need not even hold on to all the apples just let them go near the ground each cycle and she will go faster and higher or she can hold on to them and letem go all at once whatever.  You dont have to push the swing anymore.  The swing starts to push you with the energy flowing into the system from the potential energy of the plucked apples.  In the second law of thermal dynamics it is stated that the Universe does not like to have a highly condensed field of energy.  It wants the energy density at every point in the Universe to be the same.  This describes a totally radiant Universe becoming larger and cooler.  You strike a match here on this little planet eventually the Universe will distribute this action to all points.  This would create a scalar potential energy density throughout the Universe.  Lot of players out there striking lots of matches which at least locally increases the scalar energy density.

This is where mag amp has its place.But RE is from conversion at correct moment.It's a time machine.
Using mag amp or other way you have to have exponential resonance interruped at peak moments radiating RE and quickly recover high energy state.


P.S. IMHO this is the real reason why TPU output is modulated at 5khz

[wattsup]

@bolt

My post was not designed to mock you. I have been researching the TPUs for a good while now and have stumbled on something that I think will create some great havoc for many members regarding SMs OTPU, and I just needed to let out some steam. When this argument of RE/RF started, it just clicked.

Personally, I did not know what the RF meant. I was thinking Radiant Force, Radiant Field or something like that but would not have considered RE close to Radio Frequency. So since guys rarely declare their abbreviations (abs), I mean when there are two letters that can be confusing, just spell it out from the start. I am not saying do it with longer abs. Like OTPU (hint-hint) or NASA.

Now to just say RE=RF is an absolute declaration and this I have extreme problem to accept it at face value. If you said (RF=RE minus the "sting"), then I would start being in more agreement. Any energy form that is actually being conveyed through open air, open space could fall into that same category with their own nuances attached.

Compare it to light and one could say UV=GAMMA, they are both light.
Ice=Steam, they are both water.

Oh, Oh I'm sure @sparks in getting his pencil sharpened.

@all

I just made a video on the OTPU 60 watt bulb brightness comparisons. Very boring I know. lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3uICYap92g

I will be posting a rather long OTPU demo workings explanation tonight or tomorrow on my Understanding thread. Hope it does not ruffle up too many feathers.

[e2matrix]

I was going to reply in more detail. I cant be bothered. I am surprised even those with 1500+ post on here don't know what RF OU and RE means nor can the majority even grasp that simple RF principle is the path to RE. (radiant energy) You see you don't need to know what RE actually is only how to get it when you want some and that is RF=RE. Its not supposed to be literal its a simile. It breaks down all the hype and BS and tells you how to extract RE.....you apply simple RF understanding.

No surprise the TPU has remained hidden for 20 years and and that rate another 20+ will pass. Maybe the launch date is 2050.

Exactly what I had always assumed you meant when you said RF=RE.  People need to realize this is a discussion forum and not your college physics or calculus book.  Thank goodness as those books were way to dry whereas this forum has a flare that adds fun to things.  The only downside is some get confused too easily.  That may be good though as we don't want the easily confused playing with mega-power devices

[gyulasun]

....
I just made a video on the OTPU 60 watt bulb brightness comparisons. Very boring I know. lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3uICYap92g
....

Good job, thanks.

Bulb's nonlinear behavior can clearly be seen when comparing the change in brightness versus its input power when the voltage part of the latter went down to 60-70V and lower, linearly, as you controlled it and brightness diminished much faster.  If someone is not aware of this he can easily get fooled by using only bulbs for figuring out output power, for a few Volts difference may yield 10-15W difference easily. Of course this mistake can be reduced by 'calibrating' the bulb's known DC input power versus a lux meter and always use the lux meter when unknown power is fed into the bulb. LEDs can also be 'calibrated' this way by lux meter, but LEDs have a huge fooling possibility if someone is not aware of it:  LEDs consume current ONLY when the voltage amplitude feeding the LEDs is just above the forward voltage, under it the LED does not conduct, hence only the output waveform peaks (either the negative or positive peaks as the LED diode direction lets it) are loaded!

rgds, Gyula

[giantkiller]

RF equals Tidal wave, RE equals Rogue wave. The final design is not only in this thread but all the other threads not just as puzzles pieces but as whole pictures which spell out the keys needed. You can do this process by spark gap or by domain flipping(some won't like this term). For the vulgar we'll call it 'Shock the monkey'.
The thread name is 'Final design' not 'Final product'.

Now this process can be run with current(Edison) or excited by electrostatics(Tesla or Dollard).
The GK4 test way back when was a current and electrostatic based test regime. When the phasing is off we use current but the closer the phasing(but not bang on) the closer to electrostatic/kinetic the process gets. This happens because of the eclisping of positive / negative or expanding / decreasing fields over different types of material. In the GK4 build it was copper and iron. Two different hysteresis curves, inpedances, resistances, atomic structures, ad infinitum.
The Kapanadze devices show 9 volt battery and lead cells. Look at how the devices run loads. The 9v run filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation. The small TPUs run loads of filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation.
Kinetic? Do ya feel the particles?

I did the stungun based Kapanadze test. See attached.
Rememer: Tesla employed multiple stages of spark gaps in 1 circuit. What you don't see is the higher and higher graduating levels of sparkage or the wire gauges.

Bolt was right. Here is fortune cookie wisdom: He who bangs coils, bangs head. He who sings coils saves head. Ray Bradbury was correct too in : 'I sing 'the body' electric'.

You will never find power as long as you keep searching for it. This is not about squeezing power from power. The power is a lower, later stage of the process. Tesla: 'Exceedingly high speed voltage and high speed currents'. He did not say current. Tensors not conduction.

It is not the tidal waves that breaks the ship but the rogue wave eclipse point that disassociates the material.


p.s. It is not about finding the correct components to achieve the correct power but the choosing the correct components that can handle the achievement.