Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Relative Permittivity of Water

Started by Torana, October 14, 2010, 04:35:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Torana



Torana

good 1 not even the picture works!

the transformer in the pic at heretical is not a variac
http://hereticalbuilders.com/showthread.php?t=227&page=2

the 600 v 50A bridge rectifier is around the wrong way
the anodes are connected to the anode of the SCR , therefore reverse bias = OFF

the 100v 5A bridge rectifier is around the wrong way
the anodes are connected to 7805 + 7812 regulators inputs = wrong

its easy enough to find answers .
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_6/chpt_5/5.html

when componenents are placed backwards in a diagram its a clear indication of the lack of knowledge .

heres symbol of variac


canufi

Quote from: Torana on August 07, 2011, 03:01:06 AM
Nothing stan wrote is useable , FIG 1-1 AA circuit is BOGUS , 8XA circuit is BOGUS.

Then why have people successfully replicated the 8XA circuit such as youtube users TonyWoodside and Irondmax?

The 8xa and 9xb circuits have been shown on youtube to produce lots of hydrogen using Distilled water and tap water.

Stan may have not fully understood what was going on, but he experimented rather that used pure theory. Physicists that use pure theory without any experimentation are not scientists - they are mathematicians. That's why string theory is not science because it has no evidence to support its claims. Only when string theory is supported by experimental evidence, will it become science.

The question is whether Stan's devices produce excess energy. The devices he created may in fact just be a more efficient way of producing hydrogen, not over unity. 

The simple test to do, is to compare his steam resonator to a Walmart kettle. A kettle is 99 percent efficient since the heater in a kettle transfers all heat to the water, so the steam resonator MUST be better than a kettle if it is of any use. Developing a steam resonator that is no more efficient than  a walmart kettle is either delusion because you think Jesus is with you and helping you, or it's intentional fraud. 

I don't see why someone would waste their time inventing a steam resonator if kettle's at walmart for cheap are already 99 percent efficient....  Someone can EASILY test the steam resonator to see how fast it boils water, using a thermometer, stop watch, and 1 litre of water. Simple test to prove Stan was on to something novel.

canufi

Quote from: wfchobby on September 18, 2011, 06:28:48 AM
I have always wondered why so many appear to attempt replication using a main supply for power when I would have thought the goal was to use in a vehicle - thats why I wont replicate the 8xa because I dont see the point of spending a lot of $$$ on a board thats effectively tied to a mains supply.

The point of using household power supply is to get a 120V generator running on hydrogen instead of gasoline, and also to get home heating systems working based on the steam resonator. This technology is not just for cars, it is for households too.

Anyone who tries to get a car running on hydrogen is wasting their time. Small 1HP or 2HP generators are much easier to get running. A car is very heavy and is very costly if it fails.  A 2HP generator is $200 or less (4 stroke) and is much easier to experiment with, and easier to get running than a car or truck.

Get rid of your ego problems first; get a generator running first - not a truck or car!

What kind of moron would try and get a 3500 pound vehicle running on hydrogen, when you can get an electrical generator for $200 at harbor freight or your nearest hardware store? Not only can you get a generator running on hydrogen, you can get many of them running so that if one fails you have many backups. IF your dune buggy fails, you're screwed! you only have one dune buggy. Having more than one dune buggy is costly and time consuming. Cars are complex. Generators are not complex. Stop wasting your time getting cars to run, do it in baby steps - the generator comes first!

The amount of idiots involved in Stan Meyer replication astounds me.

If you cannot get a 2HP generator running on hydrogen, then it is NOT worth spending time on a 3500 pound volkswagon car. You're wasting your time.

A 2HP generator produces electricity and it only does that. A car does a thousand things. You don't need a thousand things, all you need is electricity. A generator is much more efficient than a car. Forget cars and trucks, just get a damn generator working. Generators can produce 120V and 12V electricity for the cell to run in a closed loop. If a generator doesn't run in a closed loop, then stan's device is not over unity, and it is not extracting energy from another source - it's just 80 percent efficiency or 60 percent, or 90 percent.