another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Of course you posted the video and wrote the description. If not you, WHO then? And how did it get posted so SOON after the demonstration itself if YOU didn't post it?

Why have you only started claiming NOW that you didn't post that video? It has been discussed for some time, well before I got here, and you never claimed that it wasn't a full and complete presentation of your claims, authorized by you, before NOW.

And just when are you going to ignore your detractors and forge on ahead with your proof? Why let a bunch of trolls distract you from your holy purpose? GO AHEAD, save the world, Rosemary.... prove that you have what you claim. There is absolutely nothing stopping you--- except the truth.

Had I pointed out that this did not represent our claim we would all have been denied the opportunity of seeing your manifold allegations and to measure the urgency with which you promote them.  I am seriously obliged to you TinselKoala for your precipitous and ill considered 'RUSH' into a debunk based as I knew it was - on such an entirely irrelevant argument.  I certainly was NOT disappointed.  And it afforded us all that opportunity see the limit of your rather unprofessional skills applied to entirely irrelevant information.  What you should have done is constrained your comments to a more professional detachment and limited it to the papers that you are well aware of but dared not remark on.  You still seem to think that people are persuaded by loud noises and empty protests.  One day you may actually learn that you rather underestimate the intelligence of those who engage here.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And lest Glen Lettenmaier again post a half page or so of spurious and unrelated links let me bring this comment back to your focus TinselKoala.

Don't make the whole forum laugh with your word games Rosie Posie - your claim is finished - kaput.  Just like I said it would be the case.  You should just forget about all of this nonsense and move on.  There no "magical zipon effect" coming from the binding of the matter in the inductive resistor, remember that?

The whole thing, this crazy miswiring of MOSFETs, has been a year-long exercise in silliness and futility and abject ignorance.  The fat lady has finally sung.

Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.  He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.  And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.  And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him.   He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting. He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick.  And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back?  And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.

I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.

[TinselKoala]

Oh, so you managed to snare poor little TK in your web did you... all this BS over the past year, was just so that I could finally, in February, be manipulated into this little trap of yours, eh?
Riiigght, that's a good one, Rosemary.

   Created by   dooziedont     (Block UserSend Message)    Latest Activity Mar 31, 2011   Date Joined Mar 12, 2011     Age 63   Country South Africa   

You aren't taking care of yourself properly... I would have guessed you were in your late seventies from your "greetings from SA" video.
Or maybe you just lied about your age when you registered the "dooziedont" account.

[TinselKoala]

And lest Glen Lettenmaier again post a half page or so of spurious and unrelated links let me bring this comment back to your focus TinselKoala.
Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.  He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.  And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.  And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him.   He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting. He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick.  And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back?  And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.

I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.

What, you think you can post the same set of lies AGAIN and get away with it? You already made this post once, dear. I think you need to take your meds and go lie ... ha ha , I mean go rest for a while until you get your memory back.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Oh, so you managed to snare poor little TK in your web did you... all this BS over the past year, was just so that I could finally, in February, be manipulated into this little trap of yours, eh?
Riiigght, that's a good one, Rosemary.

No TK - I did not intend to snare you.  You did that yourself.  But we were reasonably certain that you'd go to some considerable lengths to refute our claim based on ANYTHING AT ALL other than our papers.    And INDEED.  You did not disappoint us.  And your 'debunk' is not only irrelevant as a consequence - it is compounded by the rather crude application of allegations and innuendos and insinuations that have nothing to do with science and everything to do with propaganda.  And you and MileHigh still seem sublimely unaware of the effect of this.  Propaganda - as it's been advanced in the past is now so OVERUSED - that it serves to counter that propaganda.  When will you learn? 

Sorry if this has cost you that consulting fee.  Maybe try again?  And this time try and apply some professionalism?  That would be nice.

Rosie Pose.