How to make multiple Kicks

[forest]

Right. and remember that current is the rate of flow of charge ! You can multiply current by having more charge OR ......


That was not mistake Tesla investigated a floating ring around the equator and it had given him a mental breakdown....

[Bruce_TPU]

Right. and remember that current is the rate of flow of charge ! You can multiply current by having more charge OR ......


That was not mistake Tesla investigated a floating ring around the equator and it had given him a mental breakdown....

I did not say "more" I said speed.  Having more of something doesn't equate to it moving faster.  But don't strain your brain on that now.  Just remember it.  Work on the "kicks", and how to make more of them and to "combine" them.   

[wings]

see also this post by kmarinas86:

http://www.overunity.com/8056/cold-current-may-be-caused-by-novel-magnetic-subatomic-interaction/msg201924/#msg201924

http://www.overunity.com/9638/gyroscopic-particles-how-they-work/

test this:
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/otto/attachments-at-OU/coils_010.jpg


?
http://inamori-frontier.kyushu-u.ac.jp/electronics/common/img/spin_current_en.jpg

[Farmhand]

Marco took High voltage, coming out of a tip of metal and it moves a compass.  You have to ask, "why?" and "how can I use that?"
How can current velocity be increased?  You must also ask that question.

Bruce, Just because a compass has some residual magnetism does not mean it is immune to effects from an electric field.

Steven said that "speed" is everything!  Take a bullet and throw it at a car and it bounces off of the door.  Add velocity to that same bullet and now you have kinetic energy.  And it will pierce through the door.  Steven said that.  It is true.   

Cheers,

Bruce

Add velocity to the bullet huh, and how does that happen ? I'll tell you in case you were unaware.  By imparting energy to the bullet relative to its mass and velocity secured. When you can increase the velocity of a bullet without imparting energy or work to the bullet you have free energy. When I see that I will walk backwards to Bourke. 

In theory due to inductance we should be able to charge a wire without any current leaving the far end of the wire, but the wire is still charged by energy from the supply due to displacement current. It happens in exactly the same way as the way a Tesla coil is excited to resonance by a single wire connection to the function generator. This is common practice and is seen every day, no conduction current exits the top end of the bottom end fed Tesla coil, but it's no big deal, easily explained and fits perfectly with conventional knowledge, it is single wire excitation. Energy is input.

Gee wizz. Charge flows in an conductor/inductor due to applied potential, with no applied potential no charge will flow and so no current will result. A hose can be filled with water without any water coming out the end, but something is displaced by the water, and that is air or whatever other gas or material that was existing in the space before the water was forced to take it's place. To get the water in the hose some force must be used.

Nature cannot be cheated.

It seems the basic electrical theory that keeps being shown taught here is simply ignored.

First is the potential, it is then applied, and charge is caused to flow, this is evidenced by electron movement and what we call measured current.

EDIT: Here's an analogy, Imagine a fast boat, the engine represents the potential, the boat represents the charge, The water represents the conductor, when the potential is applied the boat moves which represents the charge flowing, when the charge flows the boat makes a wake/wave in the water which represents the measured current we see, by measuring the size of the wake we can determine the magnitude of the current. Now Imagine thousands of boats (charges) all under the force of one motor (potential) then imagine the wake produced by all the boats being measured to determine the amount and speed of the boats, This is our measured current, or electron jiggle, the electrons move as a result of the charges being forced to flow through the wire. In my opinion. I'm not the only one who thinks like this, and I explained this as my view a long time ago. Way before I heard the footsteps in the desert analogy from EPD. I think my analogy is better.

Cheers

P.S. Addendum. If the boat were to effect a jump and leave the water the wake is no longer created however the charge (boat) is still in motion. This is akin to displacement current. There is no conductor, there is no wake, but charge is still in motion under the effect of potential applied.

..

Problem, how do we measure the displacement current if there is no conduction current and electron jiggle in a conductor to measure it against or equate it to ?

Not sure I haven't thought much on that. Must be a way already in use.

..

2ND P.S. I think one of the more knowledgeable guys should open a thread called, "Electronic theory basics" Or "basics of electricity and emf" or some such thing and really get into the very basics from the beginning so it is here and there is a thread to direct people to. I mean the basics of potential and current onward.

..

[Bruce_TPU]

 

Bruce, Just because a compass has some residual magnetism does not mean it is immune to effects from an electric field.

Add velocity to the bullet huh, and how does that happen ? I'll tell you in case you were unaware.  By imparting energy to the bullet relative to its mass and velocity secured. When you can increase the velocity of a bullet without imparting energy or work to the bullet you have free energy. When I see that I will walk backwards to Bourke. 

In theory due to inductance we should be able to charge a wire without any current leaving the far end of the wire, but the wire is still charged by energy from the supply due to displacement current. It happens in exactly the same way as the way a Tesla coil is excited to resonance by a single wire connection to the function generator. This is common practice and is seen every day, no conduction current exits the top end of the bottom end fed Tesla coil, but it's no big deal, easily explained and fits perfectly with conventional knowledge, it is single wire excitation. Energy is input.

Gee wizz. Charge flows in an conductor/inductor due to applied potential, with no applied potential no charge will flow and so no current will result. A hose can be filled with water without any water coming out the end, but something is displaced by the water, and that is air or whatever other gas or material that was existing in the space before the water was forced to take it's place. To get the water in the hose some force must be used.

Nature cannot be cheated.

It seems the basic electrical theory that keeps being shown taught here is simply ignored.

First is the potential, it is then applied, and charge is caused to flow, this is evidenced by electron movement and what we call measured current.

EDIT: Here's an analogy, Imagine a fast boat, the engine represents the potential, the boat represents the charge, The water represents the conductor, when the potential is applied the boat moves which represents the charge flowing, when the charge flows the boat makes a wake/wave in the water which represents the measured current we see, by measuring the size of the wake we can determine the magnitude of the current. Now Imagine thousands of boats (charges) all under the force of one motor (potential) then imagine the wake produced by all the boats being measured to determine the amount and speed of the boats, This is our measured current, or electron jiggle, the electrons move as a result of the charges being forced to flow through the wire. In my opinion. I'm not the only one who thinks like this, and I explained this as my view a long time ago. Way before I heard the footsteps in the desert analogy from EPD. I think my analogy is better.

Cheers

P.S. Addendum. If the boat were to effect a jump and leave the water the wake is no longer created however the charge (boat) is still in motion. This is akin to displacement current. There is no conductor, there is no wake, but charge is still in motion under the effect of potential applied.

..

Problem, how do we measure the displacement current if there is no conduction current and electron jiggle in a conductor to measure it against or equate it to ?

Not sure I haven't thought much on that. Must be a way already in use.

..

2ND P.S. I think one of the more knowledgeable guys should open a thread called, "Electronic theory basics" Or "basics of electricity and emf" or some such thing and really get into the very basics from the beginning so it is here and there is a thread to direct people to. I mean the basics of potential and current onward.

..

How much "work" does it take for an electron to be accelerated?   You cant possibly answer because you dont know how.

How much "work" does it take to produce kicks?  None because there is no current.

You can join milehigh and tk on former president Nixon's old team..

Nixon was going to shut down the patent office because everything to be discovered had already happened.  No new discoveries on the horizon. That was in the 1970's...hahaha

I have shown, as Steven said, that there is more on a simple wire than there should be...now some of yall need to do something with this information!   It is all that Steven had to go on in the beginning.   Dont listen to the same voces of the old guard.  They are the ones who would have tried to convince Nixon that there is nothing left to discover.

I have seen this new power source and it is amazing!  60 and 80 watts of energy bursts!

Play with the kicks....learn to make more of them....learn to combine them.  It is not hard.  Just learning how to make electrons move!

Cheers,

Bruce