1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[d3x0r]

One more rough sim, then I'll do a better job...


http://youtu.be/GdlT35EZqd0


Really sorry it's so long (5 minutes something)... was a lot of time thinking about where the faults were...
My original sims still had some of the rotor on, so they weren't going so well.
I had more of a skinner device with plate and lower rotors etc... but I captured it at 1 fps, and when I went to fix the framerate option it ate itself.


Need to adjust where the pivot on the arm is also, it ended up being a offset circle from the center of the drive too... but that also means the length between the drive and the gimbal changes, which requires much more force to overcome... the motors are somewhat forgiving and can be forced to torque the tops angular...
The forces are in kN and MN(newton)... because the mass blocks are like 55,000kg... the scale is really quite large in this...

But ya, still think there's merit.

[i_ron]

One more rough sim, then I'll do a better job...



But ya, still think there's merit.

With the gimbal you are sim'ing the top drive rod... you have the weight on the wrong side.



Ron

[ARMCORTEX]

There is strange things in the EF threads.

Incompetent people are arguing about a piece of metal again with accusations of ''misleading''...

Elliptical vs circular, make it so that its easily switched of driving mode and let that be that.

I'd start out with Dave Q, 2 big arrays. A good 500$ build.

Thats why I say to the untalented fucks who claim to be, put your $ in a hat and have it done right, kill the skinner right now.

Because people never learned to build shit with screwable modules thy think both cannot co exist ? Strange **** going on.

[d3x0r]

Just adding image here so I can post it on EF....


I asked my question about the math here...
http://physicshelpforum.com/showthread.php?p=26402#post26402
they're no help.


Added more technical image of drive mechanism... (Valnor or is it Artoj to thank)
Edit: replaced picture with a more (in my opinion) accurate one...

[ARMCORTEX]

Some may have built to make an easy transition between many modalities and many may have built that are reading and not posting.

A starting assumption must be made, then tested for and then the starting assumption must be changed to match the empirical results.

If YOU are so inclined, then why don't YOU fund a builder.. say like TK,, he has all the skills and knowledge needed to follow YOUR directions,, he is very talented.

Somehow I do not think that you will do that and I do not think TK would take your money unless you can convince him that there is something more than what is evident in the video.

Do you have an input as to the possible relationships that are in play?

I have mine and I am testing towards those,, I share with whom I choose and I can ignore those that I choose,, just like you can choose to ignore all of us "fill in the blank" but keep it in your own head.

my input is that your input is not proving anything, thus any input you make is worthless. And I dont share real input with non initiates.

There is no more input to give, its ''interresting'' and worth a real build.

I chip in 20$, go ahead find the machinist, get a bunch of cultists, 50 of em, I am not popular like Aaron I cant do it.