Generating 100% noiseless DC voltage and current

[Low-Q]

I'll sleep on it. Thanks guys

So, if the motor require 100mA to run, the coil can provide more output current?
More output current, can be fed into the motor, and the motor will increase the RPM until the core is saturated?
And it will then run by itself forever?

Vidar

[gyulasun]

I'll sleep on it. Thanks guys

So, if the motor require 100mA to run, the coil can provide more output current?
More output current, can be fed into the motor, and the motor will increase the RPM until the core is saturated?
And it will then run by itself forever?

Vidar

Hi Vidar and all,

Well, it sounds as simple as you have summed up but I do think in practice there are several problems to solve for, otherwise this motor/generator combination  would have already gained higher reputation among its replicators...  Since the time periode from 1994-1998- to nowadays the overunity capability of this setup should have turned out and should have been in use since then. 
Why is it not so?  I would like to read Stefan's opinion on this too, he is mentioned in Tao's link too.
If we cannot get any more technical/practical info on the truth, (the non-reciprocal behavior can be considered as proved) we have to experiment on it to get more and possibly final insight.

Regards
Gyula

[gyulasun]

@ Tao,

You have deleted the FEMM simulations from post #17.

I wonder, why?

Gyula

EDIT: Please could you or someone send them to me, I have had no time to study them thoroughly. e-mail: gyulasun(at)yahoo.com Thanks.

[tao]

I was hosting them and they were eating my bandwidth.

I sent you the images in email......

@ Tao,

You have deleted the FEMM simulations from post #17.

I wonder, why?

Gyula

EDIT: Please could you or someone send them to me, I have had no time to study them thoroughly. e-mail: gyulasun(at)yahoo.com Thanks.

[tao]

Gyula,

The main reason that this thing hasn't been built already and all over the place is that everyone thinks 'it is too simple' and 'why has no one else replicated it already'.

Well, I know of only one person who tried to replicate this device per Frolov's/Sullivan's specs, and that is JL Naudin. Nuadin HAD it in that first test, but in the second, he introduced too large of a magnet for that small of a toroid. So EVERYTHING reading that thinks, 'oh, see it doesn't work, I won't even bother replicating it'. Naudin should have done the variable resistance setup on that FIRST setup, he only used a 1Kohm resistor on that first setup. Had he done that all would have seen that the back torque doesn't change when the output power changes. Naudin did say though in that first test that he shorted the output and there was no back torque, this should be ALL anyone needs to conclude that further research is needed.

And what of Sullivan, and why isn't his device in the marketplace? Well, it seems he never got an actual patent on his devices, he only has that patent application. So.....