The Tesla Project

[wattsup]

@Ren

My current build is as shown here;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3972.msg77661.html#msg77661
The choke I am using is the secondary of one of my two purchased toroids. I have used many transformer secondaries just to see the differences in performance.

Using the primary side as indicate there, I am working now on the second relay side for the working circuit.

AC had wound his own choke using the secondary wire of a microwave transformer. I have one of them but I think I will wind my choke as Erfinder once hinted as a bifilar.

@all

Freaky thing though. Yesterday I posted on this thread;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3403.msg82396.html#msg82396
something I had noticed because my battery was all the way down below the 8.8 lever required to activate my relay.

I don't know why or what I did but today my battery has one up to now 13.3 volts just by leaving the whole system dormant, all connected but the main pushbutton is off so there is no production on the secondary side. The pushbutton being off disconnects the positive side of the battery but all of the negative side is still connected. The voltage just went up to that point now 13.4. I am so puzzled about this. What the f*&k is going on here?

Added:

I had switched out my microwave transformer for my second toroid transformer that is identical to the one I use as my choke. This transformer was placed on my battery  to use less desk space. I had also switched out my huge capacitor on the working side for a DC 27000uf 40vdc cap connected as per my trial #3 without any relay yet on the system. I also have a wire going from the positive of this capacitor to the positive of battery. Voltage on the battery is 13.4 and voltage off the working capacitor is 7.42 and holding steady. Tonight, I think I will have to document this with a circuit diagram because I think the connection from the positive working cap to the positive battery is causing an internal circuit cycling that I cannot really see.

[armagdn03]

Sorry, going to interrupt here, my spark gap is firing again?

@ armagdn03 ? I hate to say it, but your so wrong. Your wise in many things but this is not one of them. Each chemical element has it?s own fundamental vibrational frequencies.  Gases show this best when excited with electrical energy at specific frequencies. A spectroscope is a device that lets us find out what things are made of. It works by taking light and splitting it up into its component colors. Different elements make different colors when they glow. There are hundreds of devices like this that find an elements or materials fundamental frequency.  I rest my case.

Term: Undamped;  Not tending toward a state of rest; not damped. Used of oscillations. Amplitude does not change over time. Amplitude does not change over time! DC or static field or electrostatic field if you like.

Hmmmm, Im glad you are reading closely and questioning, but maybe you should go over something twice before posting.  my exact quote:

If there were one frequency to the fundamental unit of matter, then all matter would be the same element! see what im saying? you aren't off base with the frequency of matter deal, just don't get stuck on thinking there is just one.

My response was directed towards the idea that matter would in and of itself have a fundmeantal frequency. But as you can see from my post above, this would indicate only one element existed. You are quite correct that when excited different elements produce a different spectra of light, this is the technique used in gas chromatography and other forms of chromatography, hence my statement "you aren't off base with the frequency of matter deal, just don't get stuck on thinking there is just one. " The multitude of frequencies each matching to their respective elements is what gives us our rich spectrum of properties.

Another incredibly interesing device is what is known as a Mass Spectrometer, in which a magnetic field is held at 90 degrees to an electric field. Nulei are shot into this field and accelerated due to the impinging forces at a rate of EDcosine theta. the particles are accelerated towards a small opening at the bottom, and the user calibrates the E and B fields so that only nuclei of a certain mass make it through. Once entering the bottom region of the machine, the E field is no longer present and so the particle begins to curve according to the Centripital force law, set equal to the force of a charge in a mag field law giving the equation

radius = (MV/qB)

A detector picks up the radius of the arch, and so we are left with the variables of the Radius, the velocity, the magnetic field strength and the charge of the nuclei solved, thus all we need solve for is the mass of the particle. Through this simple physics we are left with the mass of the particle. What is interesting about this and what should be taken note of, is that a charged particle in a magnetic field will begin to rotate about an invisible axis, the frequency of this rotation is given by the equation 2pi R / velocity (given above). This frequency is not an up down motion like we "see" with our instruments, but rather a circular rotational motion, dictated by the mass of the element, and represented by 2pi R in the equation above (equation for circumference of a circle).

AHHHHH, now thats damn interesting, the mass of the element correlated directly to the frequency of the element, in two totally different machines, (chromatography, and mass spectrometer) and to boot, we are given the "shape" of the frequency and it turns out to be a spiral, all calculated with simple physics terms and equations anybody could manipulate.

What is even more interesting is that the Aurora Borialis and Australius (northern and southern lights) are caused by charged particles entering the earths magnetic  field and beginning a circular rotation of a given frequency outlined above. What is interesting to note here is that the particle is accelerated. Its speed does not change, but its velocity does (remember that velocity is a vector quantity including both magnitude and direction) hence a direction change (as in a rotation) equates to an acceleration. This acceleration gives off energy, exciting the gases in the upper atmosphere, mostly being nitrogen, bit of argon, oxygen and hydrogen. These give us our pretty colors! Here we have chromatography in nature, also those reading should take note that a charged particle in a magnetic field accelerates, though its speed does not change, and it will do so forever if left to its own devices, continually giving off energy...............hmmmmm did modern science just admit to a free energy mechanism found dancing in our skies? Perhaps admit was too strong a word. LOL.

[allcanadian]

@ All
I agree let's get back to the basics
Here is an experiment you may like, In Fig 1 our Pri/Sec is replaced with a small 12v Permanent Magnet  DC motor (M), the cap is 4700uF. In this case the motor(M) has a one inch pointer attached to it's shaft to indicate the current direction (spin direction) and duration of current flow (time), the motor is a measurement device. When the circuit controller is open the cap initially charges through L1 and M , M will turn clockwise 180 Degrees, when the circuit controller closes M will reverse direction and turn 180 Degrees counter-clockwise. In this experiment we can see M and C act as a distinct circuit, the charging of L1 occurs through the circuit controller and the discharging of the cap--- two currents. There are no prolonged oscillations in this circuit due to the fact that the capacitor C never charges above source voltage but as soon as a smaller cap is used the oscillations will resume.
What becomes very apparent in this circuit is that the "same" current has travelled through (M) twice, once when the controller was open(Fig 2) and again when the controller closed(Fig 1) and that the current flow in (M) is AC. If we look at the current flow we can also see that the electrical momentum (discharge current) of L1 is acting in the same direction as the source battery when "C" is charging. In general we can say the circuit components are always complementing each others actions making for a very efficient circuit. As well if the motor (M) is replaced with a commutated AC motor the motor will turn in one direction only as it is an AC motor.
Best of luck

[am1ll3r]

Just wanted to post a quick pic of the circuit controller I made...
Its a motor out of an old HO train and a nut. Its not the greatest but it does work.
My set up is exactly  as the ozone patent and I have come to notice some things.
In the "working" circuit I have tried various caps to cancel the self inductance of the secondary of the transformer and I'm seeing  how the "load" effects the "charging" circuit. My motor will spin fast and then slow down as the cap in the working circuit fills up. Again I know my parts aren't tuned but I am able to vary the speed of the motor (using my finger to slow it down) and I can see by adjusting that one piece of the circuit I see major changes in the working circuit. For instance when I use my 1.1 mF cap from and old microwave and I'm not slowing down the motor the cap will charge up to 90 to 100 V but when I slow down the motor(tune it) I can raise the Voltage up to 300 to 350.
What I'm wondering is when trying to make something useful out of this do you first consider the load then build the rest of the circuit to match it?
Oh and and as wattsup has stated my battery has held the same charge over many days of testing.
I still want to dissect the ozone circuit and show it in some sort of animated gif and have an explanation of what happening at all points in one cycle of the circuit.

my $.02 for now 

[wattsup]

@AC

I tried it. The circuit does exactly what you said it would. lol

I didn't have a 4700uf. With a 2700uf it turned about 1/8th when closed and came back when opened. Tried with a 17,000uf and it turned about 1 1/2 turns when closed and came back when opened. These were DC caps.

I tried with a regular AC type cap that has the ground band on the side and it just heated up hot. The DC caps did not heat up and the L1 also stayed cold even when the circuit switch was left open for a long time.

So this is proof positive that the current is flowing in two directions.

And THIS ALSO COULD EXPLAIN WHY I  have had so much trouble with the ozone patent, trying to figure out which terminal A or B was positive and which was negative. Erfinder said the A was positive but between you and me, that did not help one bit. I was still confused. So, the motor coil is being supplied DC and one would naturally follow this path all around the circuit, but in fact, the motor side (high inductance) of the rotary was DC and the primary/secondary/capacitor side of the rotary was AC. IS THIS RIGHT?

Man oh man, if this is right, now I get it. Tesla, you sly devil you. lol