BREAKING : **~Imhotep~**'s Free Energy Radiant Oscillator Lite

[Vortex1]

Omega_0

I agree with your observations except for two points you mention:

This circuit, however, increases the efficiency, and lets you store some of the energy which is normally lost.

Point one;

Actually this is an extremely inefficient way to light a fluorescent lamp. If you want to explore the efficient way, check out the Royer oscillators used in many laptop computers. The designers of these are extremely energy conscious. No huge ignition coil, no sparking relay contacts which besides EMI radiation losses, heat up thermally and waste lots of energy.

Point two:

In actuality, the energy of the flyback pulse is not lost if uncaptured, but allows the ringing to occur for a longer time and with higher amplitude, therefore the overall energy appears in the secondary, as I pointed out in an earlier post.

To restate,  any attempt to capture or utilize the flyback pulse reduces both the amplitude and duration of secondary oscillations by dampening them. So less energy appears in the secondary.

This dual battery scheme with one charging the other is just sleight of hand. With a little skill, the circuit could be arranged with a single primary battery such that the flyback pulse charges the primary battery. The circuit will still run down the primary battery.

Do extremely careful measurements of the energy budget in this type of circuit to cut through the BS.

To get a quick look at how the energy moves around the circuit, use large electrolytic capacitors instead of batteries as pointed out by others many times earlier.

Bedini will not do this (the single battery), thats why he is able to keep  his snake oil show on the road.

Sooner or later, the truth of this type of intellectual scam will be revealed. Sorry Bedini believers, I bought his book, built his devices, and followed his claims from the very beginning (80's) and my tests show no OU.

But Bedini slips and slides around a lot, and when confronted on the OU issue, he backtracks to "just a better way to charge batteries". Pulse battery charging has been around a long, long time.

If any disagree, go ahead with it, you will certainly learn a few eye opening facts along the way, but only if you take careful energy measurements.

Just tryin to save y'all some time.

[waterhouse24]

Contrar my friend, the energy of the flyback pulse is not lost if uncaptured, but allows the ringing to occur for a longer time and with higher amplitude, therefore the overall energy appears in the secondary, as I pointed out in an earlier post.

To restate,  any attempt to capture or utilize the flyback pulse reduces both the amplitude and duration of secondary oscillations by dampening them. So less energy appears in the secondary.

This dual battery scheme with one charging the other is just sleight of hand. With a little skill, the circuit could be arranged with a single primary battery such that the flyback pulse charges the primary battery. The circuit will still run down the primary battery.

Do extremely careful measurements of the energy budget in this type of circuit to cut through the BS.

To get a quick look at how the energy moves around the circuit, use large electrolytic capacitors instead of batteries as pointed out by others many times earlier.

Bedini will not do this (the single battery), thats why he is able to keep  his snake oil show on the road.

Sooner or later, the truth of this type of intellectual scam will be revealed. Sorry Bedini believers, I bought his book, built his devices, and followed his claims from the very beginning (80's) and my tests show no OU.

But Bedini slips and slides around a lot, and when confronted on the OU issue, he backtracks to "just a better way to charge batteries". Pulse battery charging has been around a long, long time.

If you disagree, go ahead with it, you will certainly learn a few eye opening facts along the way, but only if you take careful energy measurements.

Just tryin to save y'all some time.

But I'm lighting my house for less than i'm paying the electric company... Is that not worth the time until we continue to wait for an energy solution?

[Vortex1]

But I'm lighting my house for less than i'm paying the electric company... Is that not worth the time until we continue to wait for an energy solution?

Say what?

Try entry again, does not compute.

[waterhouse24]

Say what?

Try entry again, does not compute.

If I plugged the same bulbs into the grid I would be drawing 36 watts... with this system i'm drawing 3 watts and charging batteries..

compute..

[robbie47]

Wha, ha, this thread  becomes one big comic strip