Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[giantkiller]

28awg Turns = 217 @ 2 3/4 length @ 3/4" diameter = 511.294 inches or 42 ft.

215.734uH @ .005Mhz = 4.7Uf for LC tank resonance.
http://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/LC-Resonance-Calculator.phtml

The mechanical side of the design dictates the LC and frequency parameters. I can alter the operation by changing the frequency and matching capacitor. If I wanted to start off with the freqency then the coil by itself would be a different size.

I will try sines also.

SM stated snipping very small ends of wires off. Ouch.

--giantkiller.

[buzz-ard]

@GK - This is an edit of my original post, since you posted your calculations while I was writing this. Good call on the tubing. Observing the mechanical aspects of each build has taught me much also. And thanks for the calculator link - that should prove very handy. I had a similar eureka moment when I realized the correlation between size/windings/frequency - everyone's thinking is converging, it seems. I really believe we're on the right path.

I ended up doing things a little differently that I had originally planned. I haven't had alot of luck with completely round core bundles, so I changed my mind on this part. The 5" diameter didn't feel good, mainly because smaller diameter means higher frequencies. Plus, I'm trying real hard to stick more or less to the patent, and the core is shown there as being tall and skinny. I opted against plastic tubing since I want my primary windings to be as close to the core material as possible. It's hard to scale a conceptual patent drawing, so I made a guess that a good replica of 381970 might be 6 or 7 inches if wound as drawn using moderate-size wire. I began by making my quarters the hard way last night (I'm running way behind this week). I measured 24" of wire 50 times (it was a 100' bundle). Then I cut each at the 6" mark, yielding 200 quarter-circle segments. Tonight I hope to bundle these segments together in a shape like the patent shows (3x21 as drawn, I'll actually end up with 2 outer layers of 17 strands and one center layer of 16 strands). I'm taking photos - see the latest at http://www.randallsteward.com/TPU/, last link.

SM's snipping of wire ends, the way I remember it, involved tuning his delay coil. I've played with removing one turn at a time but I don't want to think about doing too much snipping. Ouch indeed.

I don't know if you are following Pauldude000's thread at http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4454, but he's moving along a similar path. Paul's a sharp guy; he's been keeping me stoked for several weeks now. It's worth keeping an eye on things over there as we go along.

[Spider]

@GK,

Always nice to read your great results!!

Did you mean something like this?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=get67

Greetings Rene

More to come.

[giantkiller]

@GK,

Always nice to read your great results!!

Did you mean something like this?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=get67

Greetings Rene

More to come.

The sine wave circuit that Bolt showed me to produce for the heterodyning experiment was the key to the whole mystery. This has been working for a year and the results are still conclusive.

1: You push at the right frequency. A reciprocal pressure returns.
2: The dc with the ac hash is the DC polarized field with the ac being the resonant frequency pressure on top. You create tidal waves.
3: The rotational field can be seen in alot of places. Alot have shown the vortex aka the RMF. The water and wind based storms.
    I and IS created a rotation audio pressure by heterodyning. At the right mix it is created from the applied pressures.
    This was an environmental expample. Pretty simple.
4: I switched back to square waves to see the difference in the applied pressures.
5: With square waves applied, when the ring starts, or the ramping up, the high speed edges of the  pulse present a brick wall to the returning reflection. This is an abrupt force by multiplication. The scopes, the amp meters, the dogs all go flying. Ever do a belly flop? Was that usefull? What be a better way for a transistion?
6: The thump, thump, thump, is the ramp up and control just before over run.
7: Why sine waves? Smooth pressure to keep the energy at lower reactive levels compatible with copper, steel or iron conductors. The tidal wave against the wall just causes it to fly off. Pressure the force in complete balance with the reciprocal motion. Heterodyning.
8: The audio produced standing waves. The distance controllable by frequency? Yes and heterodyning too.

Ok so the previous explanations are mix of science, physics, electronics, magnetics and good old fashion 'What makes it tick?'.
I have all these aspects on my bench right now. I have all these aspects previously documented by 1 1/2 years here. I have posted all these aspects by words, explanations, and pictures. Many times over. These aspects were achieved by me doing what others have told me to do. And it all worked.
Am I trying to wreck the party? No. I am saying that the last step is to hook all this together. The last tests have gotten easier due to the fact that most of it all works at the minor levels. When I saw the ramp up, the meter go snapping into overload, the scope get blwon I saw what Otto, Ronotte, the ECD tests showed. The sine wave operation lets you see the kicks from the heterodyning with the whole system. And that can be seen to make useful. The square waves are already fast and noisy. How are you to catch that? Heterodyning with square waves looks like noise.
Heterodyning with 1 frequency. Yep. You can do it slopping in a tub of water. Same speed = same pressure. Speed equals voltage. When the water rises over the lip is where you see the kick.  It's afterward, the end of the ramp up, the start of the runaway.  IALMAO Now!
The circuitry can handle the ramp up far greater than the pansy ass digital scopes can. So you can only watch it so far. But the cheapy digital VOMs are a great visual fuse. LOL. 100ma, OV, 100ma, OV, 100ma, OV. and so on and so on.

I am hooking more up this weekend. Now don't get me wrong. It has taken alot of builds and that is most unfortunate in some cases. But now I can go to the next step. Seeing is believing. The mantra, so many times, was build, build, build.

Lets stop the old experimentation techniques. Think about playing with waves. Through the conductor (DC) and across the conductor (Sine). We are not using AC here. Everything goes the same way. Atleast that is what I have seen.

Now go get 5 iron nails. Wrap 30awg from rat shack around for 2 inches. Wrap 22awg around that for 1 inch. Build a blocking oscillator with variable frequency. Pulse the outside coil that is connected back through the inside coil either the same way or opposite. Put a scope on it. And check it out! Change the freq till it sings. You now have a starting platform and an incredible insight into cheap ways. Build 3 more and you have a 4 quadrant ring. Or coil wind the nails together end to end with paper insulators. Bend them around to wire the last ends together with paper in the middle. OR take a box of  coiled soft 1/4" copper tubing. Don't unwind it. Duct tape to a window. Connect one end to a stun gun. Leave the other end an inch from the other stun gun terminal. You can communicate with animals or airplanes overhead. All the technology is right under our noses.

--giantkiller. Itty, bitty, NT coils.

Yes sir! That is only the pulse and flux flow. The trailing, latent wave expands and collapses creating the heterodyning environment. It is flat on the scope screen and so 'Mono'! But you think 3d anyway and that is a great help to see the static, dynamic, & relational harmony. I posted a similar avi months ago when I thought out the interplay. When I got the waveforms cooperating is then that the bell rung. You can model all day long. But when reality steps in your face the really simplistic answer come forth. Transformer saturation is the dc field. OMG. The pulses or activity is the hash or the feedback. No, really? LOL. The first setup I did is when the ramp up went 'ting, ting, ting', then 'woop,woop,woop', then 'WUMP,WUMP,WUMP'. Ya like that? That was on the scope when the fet blew. I plug in another fet. Turn it on. Same thing. I change the coil config on the iron bars to raise the load. Turn it on. That was the last scope shot series I posted. I repeat 'I raised  the load'. This would be equivalent to squelching the ramping activity to deter runaway. I am going back all over this again. I now have a simple physical model that, in my mind, sets the stage for the next steps.

I ask all attending 'What else could the ramp up to runaway mean?'. 'Where are the other clear answers?'. The management is a form of current / load control. The coils being the internal generator load not the external load.

OBTW. Increase the current to get the field into the center of the ring so the waves collide. It helps the activity.  I posted that 20 months ago. For the newbies, this is the 3rd server. The first really crashed. Backups had to be recalled. Things are missing.

--giantkiller.

[sparks]

What kinda load are you going to drive?  Oscilliscope shots are so meaningless to the layman.    Maybe a huge neon sign saying

  "GET YOUR FREE ENERGY HERE"

Hope your smiling GK cause I am.  Your wife should get a  kick  out of it too.


     Love you brother from another mother